West Is Best: Protected Lands Promote Washington Jobs and Higher Incomes

“Being good stewards of our natural resources and environment is critical to our region’s continued international competitiveness. It gives us a leg up when encouraging business to grow here and create good jobs.”

–Maud Daudon, President & CEO, Seattle Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce

Washington’s economy is growing and outperforming the rest of the country.

This fact sheet summarizes Washington’s recent economic growth and the role of protected public lands in supporting faster job creation and higher per-capita income. It is part of a larger report — West is Best — that analyzes how and why the West is outperforming the nation, and the competitive advantage offered by its protected lands, which attract talent, investment, and businesses.

Washington vs Non-Western U.S.,
Percent Change, 2000-2011

Chart: Washington vs U.S., Percent Change 2000-2011


From 2000 to 2011, Washington’s rate of population, employment, and real personal income growth each outpaced the rest of the nation.

Higher-wage services industries lead Washington’s growth.

Change in Employment by Industry, Washington, 2000-2011

Chart: Change in Employment by Industry, Washington 2000-2011

From 2000 to 2011, Washington’s economy created 305,670 net new jobs, with the great majority of this growth coming from services industries, many of them high-paying. The fastest growing sectors included health care, professional and technical services, and real estate.

Protected federal lands help create more jobs…

Washington was ranked 2nd in the nation compared to other states by the Kauffman Foundation for having the resources to be well-positioned for future growth.

Percent Change in Employment,
Non-Metro West, 1970-2010

Chart: Percent Change in Employment, Non-Metro West, 1970-2010


From 1970 to 2010, western non-metro counties with more than 30% of the county’s land base in federal protected status increased jobs by 345%. As the share of federal lands in protected status goes down, the rate of job growth declines as well. Non-metro counties with no protected federal land increased jobs by 83%.

…and contribute to higher incomes.

Average Increase in Per-Capita Income from Protected Public Lands for Non-Metro West, 2010

Chart: Average Increase in Per-Capita Income from Protected Public Lands for Non-Metro West, 2010


On average, western non-metro counties have a per capita income that is $436 higher for every 10,000 acres of protected federal lands within their boundaries.

Non-metro counties in the West with protected federal lands have higher per-capita incomes than counties without any protected lands. For example, a non-metro western county with 100,000 acres of protected public lands has on average a per capita income that is $4,360 higher than a county with no protected public lands.

References

  • The West is defined as the 11 public lands continental western states: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming. “Protected” federal lands include areas such as National Parks, Wilderness, National Monuments, National Conservation Areas, National Recreation Areas, National Wild and Scenic Rivers, and National Wildlife Refuges. For more details, see: the full report.
  • Non-Metropolitan counties are counties without an urbanized area of 50,000 or more population, or a high degree of social and economic integration with a Metropolitan Statistical Area as measured by commuting ties.
  • Data in this publication are from: U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System, Washington, D.C.; U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Census Bureau, Population Division, Washington, D.C.; U.S. Department of Commerce. 2012. Bureau of Economic Analysis, Regional Economic Information System, Washington, D.C.; U.S. Department of Commerce. 2011. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns, Washington, D.C.; AZ Land Resources Information System, 2009; MT Natural Heritage Program, 2008; Conservation Biology Institute, 2008 (for CA); Conservation Biology Institute, 2006 (for remaining states).
  • Details on the per-capita income study are in our Technical Report.
  • Some industry categories have been modified from the original source to better illustrate employment in sub-sectors that are important to the western economy. Wood Products Manufacturing is a sub-set of total Manufacturing and consists of the wood product (NAICS 511) and paper (NAICS 537) manufacturing sectors. The Bureau of Economic Analysis does not report employment at this NAICS level (i.e., the 3-digit level), but does provide personal income at this level. To estimate employment for these sectors at the 3-digit level, we calculated a ratio consisting of personal income earned in these sectors divided by personal income earned in all manufacturing. We multiplied this ratio by total manufacturing employment to estimate the number of jobs in wood products and paper manufacturing. Manufacturing consists of total manufacturing minus Woods Products Manufacturing. Forestry is part of Forestry, Fishing, Related Activities, and Other and consists of the non-manufacturing components of the timber industry, such as growing and harvesting.
  • Details on the Kauffman report.
Author:
Ray Rasker, Ph.D.

For more information about this topic contact: