• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Headwaters Economics

Headwaters Economics

Independent Nonpartisan Research

  • Research
    • Economic Development
    • Equity
    • Natural Hazards
    • Public Lands
    • Outdoor Recreation
    • Tax Policy
  • Tools
  • About Us
  • Search
Commentary

Wildlife Refuge Payments: Reforms and Funding

Authored by Mark Haggerty on April 26, 2016

We recently wrote a paper detailing policy options for USFWS Refuge Revenue Sharing payments. These wildlife refuge payments compensate counties for non-taxable federal lands.

For several decades, funding battles in Congress have limited actual payments to counties (appropriations) to much less than the total amount authorized by legislation (see figure below).

National Wildlife Refuge Revenue Sharing Payments:
Authorized and Appropriated Payments, FY 1972-FY 2015

large-image-wildlife-refuge-payments-auth-vs-actual

In addition, the existing payment formula has a quirk that authorizes continually higher payments largely for wealthy communities. This has eroded support from the Obama Administration for continuing appropriations.

Instead, the Administration has proposed making payments to counties based on the value of net receipts. Ending appropriations would have lowered payments from $18.3 million to $1.3 million in the last year (see the figure above).

Lower county payments will reduce revenue for local services (including schools) critical to leveraging the economic opportunities Refuges offer, particularly in rural communities. This will in turn erode local support for the conservation missions of National Wildlife Refuges (particularly refuge expansions).

For example, the payment to Harney County, Oregon, for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge was $75,951. Without appropriations, it would have been $1,492.

Our refuge payment reform paper and related research post offer a variety of proposals on how to reform, rather than eliminate payments.

Research includes the idea of combining several federal county payment programs into a single payment based on an updated formula to address cost concerns, establishing a natural resources trust, or rethinking creative revenue sources such as basing payments on the value of ecosystem services maintained on those federal lands.

Related Visualization

Related data visualizationDataViz
Published on April 26, 2016Posted under County Payments
Author:
Mark Haggerty

For more information about this topic contact:

Kelly Pohl
  • 406.599.7841
  • kelly@headwaterseconomics.org

Related Research

Bar chart showing payments to counties County Payment Reform Ideas, and Analysis of Recent Proposals
county payments map County Payments: History, Context, and Policy
Reforming Wildlife Refuge Payments
Logging Truck, County Payments, endowing federal public land counties County Payments Research

Footer

Independent Nonpartisan Research

Contact

© 2023 Headwaters Economics, all rights reserved

  • Sitemap
  • Terms of Use
  • Photo Credits
  • Media Coverage
  • Slides
  • Contact
  • Twitter
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.